Home
About Us
The Debate
Our Opinion
FAQS
Solutions
Maryland Experience
Publications
National Survey
References
Contact Us

Home>The Debate

The Debate: Latest Updates

Click here for history of how the JCAHO mandate to change from the rule of six to standardized drips evolved.

December 21, 2004: Official JCAHO Stance on Rule of Six

In their publication This month at the Joint Commission JCAHO reports their latest official stance on the Rule of Six which confirms the letter we received from the Standards Interpretations Group earlier this month. Below is text from the JCAHO publication. Click here to view the actual page on the JCAHO website.

Transition plan from "Rule of 6"
After consultation with safety experts, the Joint Commission has reaffirmed the requirement that pediatric hospitals and services which currently use the "Rule of 6" convert to standardized concentrations, as required by National Patient Safety Goal 3b, no later than December 31, 2008. The Rule of 6 is a methodology used in pediatrics to simplify IV preparation of weight-based drugs. A significant number of pediatric hospitals have requested permission to continue to use the Rule of 6 as an alternative approach to the NPSG requirement during some or all of the interim period. A plan that enables these organizations to transition to the Rule of 6 was developed in collaboration with representatives of American Academy of Pediatrics, Child Health Corporation of America, Institute for Safe Medication Practices, and National Association of Children's Hospitals and Related Institutes, among others, and is supported by the Sentinel Event Advisory Group.

Requests for alternative approaches to NPSG 3b will continue to be considered and will require ongoing evidence of progress toward full implementation by December 31, 2008, of the use of standardized drug concentrations. The eligibility criteria for participation in the exceptions process during the transition period are:
 

bulletThe exception applies only to neonatal or pediatric acute care services.
 
bulletAll (emergent and non-emergent) admixtures are prepared only by pharmacy staff in a sterile environment.
 
bulletCalculations of the drug solutions are validated during the preparation.
 
bulletThe labeling of solution concentration and drug per milliliter are clear to all caregivers, and the solution concentration (amount of drug per unit volume of solution) is clearly indicated on the label.
 
bulletIf the Rule of 6 is used in a pediatric setting, but standardized drug concentrations are used in other parts of the hospital, guidance aids are made available to caregivers who may not be familiar with one of these systems.
 
bulletIf the organization has a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, the pharmacy is open 24 hours a day to support the admixture service.
 
bulletSmart pumps are used. (Smart pumps are designed to recognize prescription errors, dose misinterpretations and keypad programming errors.)
(Contact: Kurt Patton, kpatton@jcaho.org)

 

December 10, 2004: Letter from Standards Interpretation Group

In response to numerous queries to our website about  unofficial change in the JCAHO stance on the rule of six to allow "alternatives" to National Patient Safety Goal 3b we contacted JCAHO by phone and spoke with an associate director of the Standards Interpretation Group. Below is an email reply to us in response to this phone conversation representing their preliminary stance on the Rule of Six.

"The JCAHO does not support indefinite continued use of the Rule of 6. Exceptions to the NPSG are only being allowed on a transitional basis. Therefore, the Joint commission will require complete conversion to standardized concentrations by a date certain, specifically, alternatives that rely on the Rule of 6 will no longer be considered to be in compliance after December 31, 2008. Prior to that date, however, organizations will need time to switch software applications as the changes needed in an already highly automated pharmacy are extensive if their system has built in use of the Rule of 6. EACH year, organizations using an approved Rule of 6 alternative must show some demonstrable movement towards the goal of
standardized concentrations. The JCAHO has an alternative review process and associated form for
considering applications for approval of alternative means of achieving a NPSG. This process could be used by those pediatric hospitals that want to continue using Rule of 6. Screening criteria could be designed to evaluate those  requests.

These criteria would include:
1. The emergent and non-emergent admixture are prepared by pharmacy (not unit) staff using sterile environment.

2. The solution calculations are validated during the preparation.

3. The labeling of solution concentrations and drug per ml are clear to all caregivers. The solution concentration ( amount of drug per unit volume of
solution) is clearly indicated on the label.

4. If the Rule of 6 is used in a pediatric setting, but standardized concentrations are used in other parts of the hospital, aides are provided for caregivers who may not be as familiar with one of those systems.

5. If the organization has a NICU, the pharmacy is open 24 hours a day to support the admixture service.

6. Smart pumps are utilized. ( smart pumps are a parenteral infusion pump equipped with IV medication error-prone software that is designed to recognize prescription errors, dose misinterpretations and keypad
programming errors.


I hope this information was helpful. If you have additional questions email or contact the standards interpretation group at 630-792-5900.

Carol M.Ptasinski RN MSN MBA
Associate Director, Standards Interpretation Group
Accreditation Operations
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations"

Key Links:

Latest JCAHO Stance: Dec 2004

ISMP - Home

High Alert Medications

JCAHO - Home

JCAHO -
National Patient Safety Goals

JCAHO -
National Patient Safety Goals FAQs

 

About Us | The Debate | Our Opinion | FAQS | Solutions | Maryland Experience | Publications | National Survey | References | Contact Us

THIS PAGE IS NOT A PUBLICATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE HAS NOT EDITED OR EXAMINED THE CONTENT. THE AUTHOR(S) OF THE PAGE ARE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTENT.